For those who prefer Video: Click here!
Never. Meanwhile, YEC is one of the valid views of Genesis, there are some problems for YEC:
1. If plain text reading is the only authenticated
method of the Bible study then nobody can ever reach in-depth of the Bible but remain
satisfied within the floatation interpretation. In this way, the question
"Where did Jesus say He is God and worship me?" is a valid question!
2. If the Bible is written in a way
that every generations of people from worldwide civilization can easily
understand then why need of sermons, Bible college, Sunday schools?
3. The focus of YEC is nothing
different from the event at garden of Eden i.e. serpent tempted Eve for a
forbidden tree that wasn't a real concern for God and they lost their
fellowship with him.
4. Always making bold claims that
science should be re-interpreted must be revised. Even the Bible needs to be
revised if we really misunderstood it. The revision is not about its revelation
but the explanation in the right context, purpose, concern and motive.
5. YEC's fatal argument indeed
proves evolution! If all carnivores and predators got the terrific forms due to
sin, then wouldn't Adam and Eve had also got severe changed? They did it first
not the rest creatures! So, isn't the evolution (modern language) then true for
Adam and Eve (after effect of sin)?
One can hold to YEC position and this doesn't make anyone
heretic but be sure not to be dogmatic!
.png)
.png)
.png)
0 Comments