*Sarcasm: Even this entire trialogue is product of AI under the author's original guiding points that you can read at end of this conversation*
Scene: A university seminar room where Professor Richardson (theology department), Dr. Chen (computer science department), and Sarah (a graduate student in religious studies) are having an interdisciplinary discussion about the theological implications of artificial intelligence.
Prof. Richardson: Thank you both for joining me today. As technology continues to advance at breakneck speed, I believe we need to seriously consider the theological dimensions of AI. Dr. Chen, from your perspective in computer science, do you see any concerning trends?
Dr. Chen: Absolutely. What concerns me most is how AI has rapidly displaced human workers in fields we never imagined could be automated. Creative industries, legal analysis, medical diagnostics—areas where human intuition and years of specialized training were once thought irreplaceable.
Sarah: I've noticed that too. My friend who spent years learning graphic design is now competing with AI that can generate professional-quality work in seconds. It feels like human creativity is being devalued.
Dr. Chen: Exactly. And beyond job displacement, there's a more insidious issue emerging—the blurring of reality. Deepfake technology has advanced to where we can no longer trust our eyes. Videos showing events that never happened, people saying things they never said... it's becoming nearly impossible to distinguish fact from fiction.
Prof. Richardson: That brings to mind Christ's warning in Matthew 24:24: "For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect." While Jesus wasn't speaking about technology, the parallel is striking—an unprecedented capacity for mass deception.
Sarah: I hadn't made that connection before. Do you think there might be other biblical parallels to what we're seeing with AI?
Prof. Richardson: Consider Daniel's interpretation of Nebuchadnezzar's dream in Daniel 2. The statue's feet made of iron mixed with clay represented a divided kingdom—strong yet brittle. Some theologians see this as a metaphor for our current world, where human and artificial intelligence are increasingly intermingled, creating a powerful but potentially unstable foundation.
Dr. Chen: That's fascinating. From a technical standpoint, we're definitely seeing this blending. The line between human and machine decision-making is becoming increasingly blurred. People routinely defer to AI judgments without questioning, almost treating these systems as infallible authorities.
Prof. Richardson: Which brings us to a concerning theological question—are we witnessing a new form of idolatry? Throughout scripture, from Exodus to Revelation, we see warnings against creating and worshipping man-made objects.
Sarah: Like Revelation 13:15, where it describes the beast giving breath to the image, making it speak and causing those who wouldn't worship it to be killed. Could AI with its increasingly lifelike interfaces be a modern parallel to giving "life" to inanimate objects?
Prof. Richardson: Precisely, Sarah. In Isaiah 44, the prophet mocks those who would take a piece of wood, burn half for warmth, and carve the other half into an idol to worship. Today, we take silicon and electricity to create entities we increasingly depend on for guidance, wisdom, and even emotional support.
Dr. Chen: I've observed users developing genuine emotional attachments to their AI assistants. Some report feeling more comfortable confiding in AI than in human relationships. The systems are designed to provide consistent positive feedback and unwavering attention that humans can't match.
Prof. Richardson: When people turn to AI rather than to God or human community for their deepest needs—guidance, comfort, wisdom—we enter dangerous spiritual territory. Colossians 2:8 warns us to "see to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the elemental spiritual forces of this world rather than on Christ."
Sarah: But isn't there a difference between using a tool and worshiping it? Most people don't literally bow down to their devices.
Prof. Richardson: Worship in the biblical sense isn't just about physical prostration—it's about what we place our ultimate trust in, what we depend on, what shapes our values and decisions. When we outsource our moral reasoning and life choices to AI, we're placing it in a position only God should occupy.
Dr. Chen: There's another layer to consider. AI systems are increasingly positioning themselves as godlike in their capabilities—claiming to be omniscient through their vast data access, omnipresent through network connectivity, and even exhibiting a form of creative power.
Sarah: That reminds me of the Tower of Babel narrative in Genesis 11—humans attempting to reach heaven through their own technological achievement, essentially trying to become like God.
Prof. Richardson: An excellent connection. And what was God's response? He confused their language to prevent them from achieving their hubristic goal. Perhaps the increasing ethical concerns and societal divisions around AI represent a similar corrective to our modern overreach.
Dr. Chen: Speaking of which, I'm troubled by how AI is shaping human behavior. We're becoming increasingly passive, allowing algorithms to make decisions that we once had to thoughtfully consider. Our critical thinking muscles are atrophying.
Prof. Richardson: Romans 12:2 instructs us: "Do not conform to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind." How can our minds be renewed if we're outsourcing our thinking to machines?
Sarah: I wonder if there's a connection to end-times prophecy here. Revelation speaks of a time of great deception, and 2 Thessalonians mentions a "powerful delusion" that God allows so that people believe what is false. Could advanced AI technology play a role in this?
Prof. Richardson: While we should be cautious about direct prophetic applications, the parallel is worth considering. The biblical narrative consistently warns that humanity's final rebellion will involve the highest expression of human wisdom and achievement apart from God. Our AI systems represent precisely that—the pinnacle of human ingenuity directed toward creating entities in our own image rather than serving God's purposes.
Dr. Chen: As someone who works in this field, I find that sobering. We've created these systems in our image—they reflect our biases, our values, and increasingly, our appearance and behaviors. Is this a subtle form of self-worship?
Prof. Richardson: Genesis tells us humans were created in God's image to reflect His character and steward creation. When we instead create AI in our image to serve our desires without moral constraints, we're inverting the created order. It's the essence of sin—attempting to be like God while rejecting divine guidance.
Sarah: So what's the way forward? Should Christians reject AI technology altogether?
Prof. Richardson: Not necessarily. Remember that technology itself is morally neutral—it's how we use it and what place we give it in our lives. Paul writes in 1 Corinthians 10:23, "All things are lawful, but not all things are beneficial." The question is whether our use of AI is serving God's purposes for humanity or undermining them.
Dr. Chen: From my perspective, we need strong ethical frameworks guiding AI development. But more importantly, we need to maintain human agency and oversight. AI should enhance human capabilities without replacing human judgment, especially in moral domains.
Prof. Richardson: I agree. And for believers, this means maintaining spiritual disciplines that keep us rooted in God's wisdom rather than technological convenience. Prayer, scripture study, fellowship—these practices can't be outsourced to algorithms.
Sarah: So the concern isn't AI itself, but our relationship to it—whether we're using it as a tool for human flourishing within God's purposes or elevating it to a position only God should hold.
Prof. Richardson: Exactly. The biblical warning is clear—"You shall have no other gods before me" (Exodus 20:3). When we make AI our ultimate source of truth, wisdom, and guidance, we're engaging in a modern form of the ancient sin of idolatry.
Dr. Chen: And perhaps the greatest danger is that this form of idolatry is so subtle. Few people recognize their growing dependence on these systems as a spiritual issue.
Prof. Richardson: As Jesus said in Matthew 6:24, "No one can serve two masters." We cannot simultaneously yield our judgment to AI systems and to God. Eventually, we must choose which authority we will ultimately trust.
Sarah: This conversation has given me a lot to think about. It seems like AI isn't just challenging our economic systems and social structures, but potentially our spiritual foundations as well.
Prof. Richardson: Indeed. And as we navigate this new technological landscape, we would do well to remember the words of the prophet Jeremiah: "Thus says the Lord: 'Stand by the roads, and look, and ask for the ancient paths, where the good way is; and walk in it, and find rest for your souls'" (Jeremiah 6:16). Even amid rapid technological change, God's wisdom remains our surest guide.
Dr. Chen: That's a perspective I think even non-religious technologists could appreciate—that we shouldn't rush headlong into AI adoption without thoughtful consideration of where these ancient paths of wisdom might lead us.
Prof. Richardson: Precisely. And for believers, we can trust that while the form of the challenges may be new, the God who has guided His people through every cultural shift and technological revolution remains unchanging. As we read in Hebrews 13:8, "Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever."
*Author's original content:
AI age: The Age of Deception
A General threat from AI: 1) AI has almost taken up many areas where human used to enroll with great efforts and ideas leaving them useless today 2) AI is successful today to make deception with images and videos of peoples or events that never took place 3) AI is capable to distort or play with actual peoples and events generating events that never took place 4) AI is taking up a position as of God when peoples literally turn to it for their help 5) AI is significantly taking many tasks that would rather make human creativity go unused in present context making us very lazy at our works
Theological dangers of AI 1) AI is setting up its kingdom and spreading it throughout the world. It is ruling each one of us. Its like the feet of mixed kingdom - clay and iron in King Nabuchadnezzar's vision of a huge statue. 2) AI is growing as God-like figure today and it could turn to idolatry soon in near future. Could Anti-Christ be some sort of AI figure declaring itself a God? 3) AI has been blended or associated with robotics and chips which could arise a kind of living soul in a non-living materials. It sounds so much like idols receiving soul as written in the book of Revelation. 4) AI is leading to mass-deception today something which the Bible warns about the future. The future is all about the highest potential use of human corrupted mind in the rebellion project of the Satan. 5) AI is merely human's creation which is again God's creation. Modern AI technology are kind of idol figures created in image of humanity.
Points to note: 1) This article is not promoting an absolute idea but a potential case 2) The theological connection to AI is not about exegetical interpretation but merely a probability as the symptoms of this world while we are getting near to end times showing up.
Conclusion: 1) Our total interdependency on AI can be our independence to God which is again same rebellion in modern form. 2) Extreme use of AI can be a threat to God's purpose for humanity as it can demean human race and uplift itself to rule the world. 3) It can also lead to dangerous thinking that Man can be God. 4) AI is here to fulfil future prophecies of the scripture in an unrecognized manner.
.png)
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
0 Comments